At the beginning I would like to thank you for participating in the discussion on “Dictatorship of Jaroslaw Kaczyński” but due to the large number of comments, I am not able to answer each one individually, so please be understanding.
I presented my point of view, exposing myself to the attacks of each side of the current political scene in Poland. Some were offended that I set conditions for the President, others for raising this topic … On the other hand, few people have caught my intentions. Please note that their comments significantly increase the level of dialogue and bring a lot of good to the discussion. It is worth imitating.
I also encountered allegations of inconsistency of the text, etc.
To understand politics, the text does not have to be simple, clear and clear. He carries a message, which can be read by well-versed people. Others should try, and without offending here, please, because we are not born politicians or commentators. “Krakow wasn't built in a day”.
My goal is always and invariably one, to provoke people to think, to deeper analyzes, so that they do not make decisions based on superficial assessments. Because later, for each of our votes and thus the choice, even an “ordinary” councilor, we must bear the consequences. Whether or not they will benefit us / the municipality / state depends on this “voice”. The more we are aware of our choice, the better for us / the municipality / state. Lack of awareness, guiding by particular interests is beneficial to us as individuals and not to the state which includes a set of individuals. To better illustrate this, I will give an example certainly known to everyone, although not everyone has experienced it. Family – mother, father, children but the father is focused on himself and makes decisions so that he is comfortable and that he can meet his needs, that is, meet with colleagues and drink. When deciding on the allocation of remuneration for a “banquet” with friends and / or colleagues, he only thinks about himself and leaves his wife and children at the mercy of fate, because “what the hell, let me die,” thus shedding responsibility for my family. But did he actually drop it? or maybe he switched to others “? Who bears the consequences of his behavior? This is a very frequent example of a small but damaged social cell. I am writing about the fact that the decision to choose a husband / wife affects our whole life. The same is true with politics. If ours the voice is taken too hastily or on the basis of an incorrect assessment, we will bear the consequences We all as a society. As in the family example quoted – the whole family suffers. Instead of a “drunkard” we can put a drug addict, a fanatic, a criminal … He / she does not is alone. Their decisions affect the whole environment. In the context of family and politics, it is very important to be able to admit one's mistakes and try to fix it, but not everything can be corrected.
When looking for Man in Man, we must look deeper and deeper. We cannot rely on only two senses: sight and hearing, because they are most often misleading. Assessment based on external characteristics such as appearance, level of education, and wealth are often insufficient. We need to know what drives a Man who decides to participate in politics, because he will decide about us, for us, on our behalf. If he failed at least once, he lied, we stop our support and keep watching. If there is no improvement and our candidate continues to lie or does not fulfill his promises, we should not support such and the environment issuing such a candidate should understand that he will not build anything good on lies. The fact that we have only one candidate to choose at a time is a result of, among others our lack of commitment, inconsistency, and naivety. If we have already made a choice, this is not the end and nothing exempts us from further observation, evaluation and settlements.
Is it only possible that a keen observer can accurately assess politics? certainly not, but it helps and we are less likely to be wrong about the people assessed. And in politics, the ability to eliminate risk is desirable. Precisely through accurate assessments, such an observer is not and will not be liked in the political environment. He will be eliminated from public life, because revealing uncomfortable matters is a threat to someone's “matter”, “career”. That's why we have so many hatred in public space. This is not by accident but to order specific environments. The idea is to assign someone your own negative qualities and marginalize and push them into oblivion with a pinned patch “dumb”, “a careerist walking on the corpses to the goal” etc.
How many times has our “dictator” Kaczyński been subjected to such operations? Being so attacked, also repeatedly and mercilessly from his environment, he has come so far.
You can question the methods he uses, but you must also see the circumstances in which he must function. Therefore, in this situation, I slightly turn a blind eye to methods, because in this case the goal is important, which in the end I like and, apart from certain elements that are subject to repair and improvement, I accept. In my opinion, it could have been more and better but not in this composition. The party (without the President) is a threat to itself and I remind you and I will continue to say that as long as the situation inside the party does not change, it should not reach a constitutional majority. And Mr. President cannot receive unconditional support.
I think that every insightful observer, as well as Mr. Kaczyński himself, is aware of the dangers arising from such a situation. It is worse with those people who so gently support people, just because they belong or are associated with PiS, and not in terms of substantive assessment.
Once again, thank you very much for the discussion and special thanks to people who gave me support.
ps. Maybe not everyone knows how the batch is built, so I like graphics depicting the construction of party structures.